COMA101 Final Paper

March 27, 2008 at 10:40 am (Uncategorized)

Japanese Mores in the Philippine Setting:

An analysis on how a Japanese man acclimatizes to the Philippine Culture

 

                        A 32- year old Japanese man named Masahiko Miyawaki visited my family last February 16, 2008 for a vacation. He stayed in our house for almost a month. My older brother used to be teaching English language to some Japanese. Mr. Miyawaki was one of his students and later on, they became good friends. Mr. Miyawaki was warmly accepted by our family. We ate together, talked about each other’s country and sometimes we also went out together.

                        During Mr. Miyawaki’s first week of stay at home, we somehow felt uncomfortable talking to him. I, myself, was somehow cautious of the words I was saying for I might offend him or I might say something that he does not use to hear. I just couldn’t help but consider the fact that we grew up in different society, with a very different culture and tradition from each other. However, we become more comfortable talking to each other later on.

                        It was Mr. Miyawaki’s longest stay in the country and what’s more is that he stayed at our house. He never stayed in a hotel for he wanted to totally experienced how is it being a Filipino.During his whole stay here, he had the chance to be exposed to a lot of people and to interact with them.

                        I’ve also noticed a lot of unusual actions from him. Like actions that are not usually done by Filipinos.

                        One instance was when I invited him to watch the Tatak UPMin celebration of the university last February 19, 2008. The event was held at the Matina town square. When we arrived at the venue, we didn’t directly join the crowd sitting in front of the stage. Mr. Miyawaki looked around for a moment before we looked for some seats. After a few minutes, some of my classmates arrived standing at the side of the hall. I took him with me to introduce him to my classmates. When I started to talk, I’ve noticed that he stayed not too close to them compared to my distance from them. He probably stayed about three feet away from my classmates. That made my classmates somehow felt awkward. By then, I remembered what also happened when we were lining up to the cashier at SM Supermarket. He also stayed quite far from the person before him in the line. I didn’t bother to ask him why anyway.

                        Those situations remind me of some of the theories I’ve encountered that could possibly help me explain everything that had happened in those situations.

                        The friendship that we have, had undergone several stages before we totally became good friends.  The process can be explained by the Social Penetration Theory as introduced by psychology professors Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor. The theory states that closeness among people can only happen through a gradual process of self-disclosure (Griffin 119).

This psychological theory, as with many others, is applied in the context of interpersonal relationships such as communications. This theory makes predictions about relationship development based on levels of self disclosure.  Based on a sort of cost-reward model, this theory argues that for a relationship to develop, both parties must self disclose. In judging this theory, it is able to make predictions depending on levels of self-disclosure. .

In our situation, I was the one who opened to him first. I started discussing about myself, what my hobbies are, my favorites, the things that I like and dislike and etc. Then later on he also told me some details about himself like what I did. This had taken us more than a week before we totally felt comfortable talking to one another. The more time we spend with each other, the more likely we are to self-disclose more intimate thought and details of our lives.  

These situations are what exactly the social penetration theory suggests. It stresses that only through opening one’s self to the main route to social penetration- self disclosure- by becoming vulnerable to another person can a relationship develop. The social penetration theory affirms that as relationships develop, communication moves from relatively shallow, not intimate levels to deeper and more personal ones.

Another theory called the Uncertainty Reduction Theory also explains the developmental process of our friendship. The theory was proposed by Charles R. Berger. It predicts and explains relational development between people who does not know each other (Griffin 130). The focus of this theory is to reduce uncertainty by using human communication to gain knowledge about the other person, thus creating a more predictable and controlled relationship.

At first I really perceived him as a stranger since I really don’t know him that well yet. The scope of this theory is narrowed down to rest on the premise that strangers, upon meeting, go through certain steps and checkpoints in order to reduce uncertainty about each other and to form an idea of whether one likes or dislikes the other. Our interaction is viewed as going through several stages: The entry stage, the personal stage, and the exit stage.

When we started to asked each other questions such as where do you live? What are your hobbies?  How do you find our country, and other “getting-to-know-you” questions. Right then, we were entering the entry stage. This stage of relational development is characterized by the use of behavioral norms. The contexts of the exchanges are often demographic and transactional.

By the times that we were talking about each others beliefs and culture and trying to probe each others attitude, these had been the cue that we were undergoing the personal stage of the process. Typically this stage is entered after the strangers have had several entry stage interactions. Both of us had probed each other the indications of one another’s values, morals, and even our personal issues in life. Emotional involvement in us tends to increase as disclosures are made.

The final stage of our relational development was the exit stage. After the two stages that we had undergone, we had been able to interrelate comfortably with each other, thus, made us continue to develop our friendship. That was then the exit stage wherein the people involve will decide if they still want to develop the relationship or not.

As days passed by, we had more chances to spend time with each other now that we’ve felt at ease when talking to one another. The scenario that happened during the Tatak UPmin celebration as well as what I’ve noticed when we were in the supermarket, I realized that he was so conscious preserving his personal space those times.

The term personal space has been used to describe an imaginary bubble extending out from our bodies, an area considered to be almost as private as the body itself (Jensen and Trenholm 58).

But as defined by a theorist from the University of Arizona named Judee Burgoon who developed expectancy violations theory stated that “Personal space is the invisible, variable volume of space surrounding an individual that defines the individual’s preferred distance from others”.

An anthropologist named Edward T. Hall had presented some concepts that would explain these kinds of situation. Hall pioneered the study of interpersonal distances called proxemics. Proxemics has set four types of interpersonal spaces: Intimate distance, personal distance, social distance, and public distance.

When Mr. Miyawaki was talking to my classmates he properly maintained the interpersonal distance he must use. He stayed not too close from them perhaps because he did not want his personal space be entered. Hall stated that the personal distance serves as a protective bubble around us. It ranges out from eighteen inches to four feet that protects us from unwanted touches by other people ( DeVito 249).

This was what Mr. Miyawaki had done. He was trying to prevent himself from getting unwanted touches from the people around him whom he does not know. Nevertheless he could still touch them (shaking their hands) but only through extending their arms.

However what Mr. Miyawaki did surprised my classmates. Their reaction towards him is being justified by the Expectancy Violations Theory by Judee Burgoon. The theory explains what happens when we increase or decrease our distances from other people ( DeVito 251). Expectancies are primarily based upon social norms and specific characteristics of the communicators. The theory proposes that expectancy will influence the outcome of the communication as positive or negative and predicts that positive violations increase the attraction of the violator and negative violations decrease the attraction of the violator

My classmates really did not expect what Mr. Miyawaki had shown them. They just thought that he was just like some Filipinos, who becomes so excited meeting new people and does not really care about interpersonal spacing. Though Mr. Miyawaki had violated the expected actions or distance of my classmates, this had not given them a negative notion about him.

From the Expectancy Violation theory, there are also theories that would certainly support Mr. Miyawaki’s preservation of his personal space.

One of which is the Protection Theory. The theory states that a person establishes a body buffer zone around himself that serves as a boundary from unwanted touching and/or attack (DeVito 250).

Mr. Miyawaki became uneasy being with some of my classmates whom he does not know well and as a matter of fact he is not used to interact of a lot of people. Perhaps that’s what made him felt the need to maintain a specific distance that he’s comfortable with. Since most Filipinos, like my classmates for example, are not so sensitive when it comes to maintaining distances, nobody seemed to sensed Mr. Miyawaki’s adjustments those times. We, Filipinos do observe proper spacing but not always as what I can observe.

Another one is the equilibrium theory which I still under the vast field of interpersonal communication. Since it was Mr. Miyawaki’s first time to meet my classmates thus the level of relationship between them had not yet been establish well. The Equilibrium theory agrees on what Mr. Miyawaki had done. The theory states that intimacy and distance vary together: the greater the intimacy, the closer the distance; the lower the intimacy, the greater the distance (DeVito 251).

Masahiko had just met my classmates so certainly as what the equilibrium theory says, he must maintain a distance proportionate to their level of intimacy. Since they were my classmates, perhaps he also thought that they are good people for they are my friends. Thus he stayed not just too close yet not too far from them.

 

All of these situations starting from the time we’ve first met up to now, I have realized some vague actions and scenarios that had happened were all properly justified and understood well through the help of some certain theories. However the social penetration theory seems to pertain to real world experiences; but Altman and Taylor have disregarded several main factors that influence self disclosure.  Gender, race, and ethnic background could greatly influence the process. However, in Mr. Miyawaki’s situation, I don’t think that would be a great issue to focus on. I have understood deeply the process and the phases that we have undergone before we have totally established a good interpersonal relationship. Now I have a clear view on why some things happened during his long stay in the vicinity with my family.

In this analysis I just looked in the general notion of the theories and then used them to explain certain situations. Thus through the help of the theories I have presented, we may be able to negotiate some cultural fences successfully. By taking away these fences, we will achieve our ultimate goal of communication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Permalink Leave a Comment

SELF TALK: How loud is it in UP Mindanao?

February 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm (coma101)

Adapting to the norms and academic standard of UP Mindanao is basically one of the most crucial parts of the learning experience of the freshmen students in the institution. High standard of education plus the diverse culture of the university put a lot of pressure to most of the freshmen. This greatly affects their academic performance and social behavior in the university. This idea has pushed me to conduct an investigation on how do the freshmen manage to motivate themselves to behave in their new society and interact with the people around them.

Most people say that self talking is a way to help in boosting one’s self esteem. It helps us gain more self confidence in voicing out our opinions in school, work, and etc. The researcher wanted to find out whether these statements apply to the freshmen of UP Mindanao.

Basically this study aims to seek answers to the following:

a.        How do freshmen students of UP Mindanao encourage themselves to maintain academic excellence despite the pressure they get from their classes?

b.       Does positive self talk affect their self confidence and scholastic performance?

 

There are two ways in which we do the self talk. It could be the silent inner speech or the vocalized private speech. Self talk has been found of great significance for it can really help improve the lives of people, most specially, the students. Many people say that the best and only person that could help you in times of problem is just yourself. This is where self talking comes in. It greatly helps us motivate and cheer ourselves up and it brings good health for it relieves stress.

Self talking comes in several ways. It could be through simply thinking, chatting with ourselves, staring, sitting silently, and etc. As simple as these things that we do everyday we are already performing the self talk.

 

The researcher will interview some freshmen students from different courses in UP Mindanao. A survey will also be conducted by the researcher for statistical basis.

The study would give more knowledge to freshmen students in UP Mindanao on how to make their life more comfortable in the institution and how to endure and get along with the system of education the university offers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Permalink Leave a Comment

Elaboration Likelihood Model

January 28, 2008 at 1:30 pm (coma101)

            Based on the Elaboration Likelihood model, there are two alternative paths to persuasion. The peripheral route and the central route.Here are two TV commercials that I have chosen which I think each one possess either the peripheral or the central route.

The first one is the advertisement of the TRUST FAMILY PROGRAM wherein it promotes the use of contraceptives. For me, this uses the central route. The Ad really explains its’ motive from the biggest detail to the least detail. The doctor or the TRUST PROGRAM personnel interviewed in the Ad clearly elaborates what they wanted to tell its audience. The ad thoroughly explains what their product is all about. There really is high elaboration in the process.The speaker talks about the modern family planning through encouraging the audience to use oral contraceptive pills. Most of its viewers would probably be persuaded by the speaker, no matter how she delivers the message, since the message itself is really significant to most of us. As what the ELM says: sometimes the stand of a person will be much more influenced by what the message says than by the characteristics of the person who says it.

The next TV Ad is the commercial of Ponds Age Miracle Cream. This one obviously uses the peripheral route. No much elaboration on the  process yet it totally gets the attention of the audience, especially me. This Ad does not thoroughly elaborate its motive yet it has persuaded me to agree with them or to like its Ad. The people behind this Ad knows for a fact that most Filipinos today love teleserye’s.So they have presented the Ad  in a teleserye style without even a word coming out from the characters mouth. No further explanations have been done yet there persuasive power works for their style is unique. By simply watching it, the audience would easily get what the Ad is trying to say.



Permalink Leave a Comment

Have you seen those Chinese acrobats piled up on a single bike?

January 16, 2008 at 10:32 am (coma101)

Dear Mr. Narrator,

You really are having a hard time with your family, dont you? It is just normal my friend. I will try to explain to you why things like this happen.

Let us talk first about your mother. I would agree, it’s really annoying when someone like your mom treats you like a child, but then again, do not forget that you are not always home.Perhaps, she just misses you badly. Anyways, you were surprised when she told you that you have just hurt her feelings though you haven’t said anything. My friend, as what Watzlawick’s Interactional View had stated, one cannot not communicate. You might not say a word but your actions,body language, and facial expression talk a lot. Do you get what i mean?, even in silence you are actually communicating. Your mother might noticed something different, like the way you act whenever shes around, you know, maybe that’s what upsets her.

With regard to your sister’s attitude towards you, i would say, just don’t mind her if she wont stop hating you.She might just be jealous at the first place because you are more loved by your parents. :) But you know what, the relationship you and your sister have depends on how the two of you punctuate the communication sequence. You don’t like her, and she doesn’t like you too. Every time you see each other, you just can’t help but change your mood. The time you will be talking with each other and both of you are having a bad mood, the two of you might received the wrong message and/or misinterpret it.This causes your misunderstandings, i guess. You know this is normal in a brother-sister relationship, but it must be worked out. One of you must be patient and understand the other one.

Just stay focus and be calm my friend. They are still your family. Resolve things step by step, and you will get through this soon.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Jim and Shelly’s story

January 16, 2008 at 9:59 am (coma101)

Dear Jim,

I understand how you feel today. Like being deprived by something that you really wanted to know. Jim, here’s what i am going to tell you. Do not feel bad about this. You need to consider some things in your relationship. You have been together for a very long time, but let us not disregard the fact that as you become closer with each other, the more problems you will have and encounter that might pull your relationship down. Do not take this as a hinder but rather take this as a challenge.
With regard to Shelley’s diary,You really don’t need to see it anyways. You’re just being curious in a way that you might annoy her. I know that you wanted each other to open up. You know, tell each other’s secrets but always remember that there are some things that people choose to keep within themselves. That is what we call “privacy”. Maybe Shelly just needs personal space you know. It just a matter of trust you need to show her.
    If you would really insist to see what’s in her diary, perhaps, try to open up to her first. Try to share with her your personal secrets hoping that in the end she’ll let you read her diary. Well, you may talk to her in a positive and nice way that you want to read it, but if she says “no”, accept it. Try some other time.

Just be good always Jim, stop bothering yourself. God bless

Your friend,
Harvey

Permalink Leave a Comment

Communication Act

January 1, 2008 at 1:10 pm (coma101)

Among the seven major areas in the field of communication, the intrapersonal communication interests me a lot.

All of us do communicate with ourselves most of the time. By simply thinking, taking a bath, eating, walking alone, and the like, we are already having a talk within ourselves. These are very simple things that are somehow part of our daily routines and most people do not actually know that they are unintentionally doing the intrapersonal communication act.

Being a freshman student in a premier university, I can say that intrapersonal communication is one of the best things i must have in order to survive the different academic pressure and challenges. Not just only for me as a student but also for those people who are very prone to stress and for those who lack self motivation.

One best example of this communication act is self motivation through SELF TALKING. By simply talking to our selves positively would greatly help in boosting our morale. Assessing ourselves for the things we have done, motivating and preparing our minds for an upcoming exam, and thinking of solutions for our problems; these are just some ways on making a tight connection between you and your inner self. Many people also say that self talking is a good type of therapy that would really help lessen stress.

I have friends who low self confidence because they also have a low and lesser motivation for themselves. Though they’ve got a lot of motivation from other people such as friends and family, self motivation is a lot more helpful since it is you communicating with yourself. You know yourself and you know what it needs.

Intrapersonal communication greatly helps in character building also. For me, in order to have a good relationship/communication with other people, we must start building a better connection between us and ourselves.

Permalink 1 Comment

Was it my fault or my toothbrush’?

December 7, 2007 at 2:25 am (My journal)

I never expected my day would start that way. I was so excited to go to school today since its the last day of classes for this week. :) I was thinking of going to the malls tomorrow and hang out with my friends. Just when i thought that everything was alright, an accident happened to me. Well, it is not really an accident, perhaps i could call it as a simple carelessness….of my toothbrush…:)

When i was brushing my teeth after i had my breakfast, my toothbrush slipped from my mouth and it hit my left eye. :( It was so painful and So I panicked for I could not open my eye. :( It felt like I was in the middle of a pitch black phenomena. It took me an hour before i fully recovered my normal sight. :(

my eye turned red and it still hurts. :( Theres nothing more i could do for it had happened already. Perhaps the best thing to think about now, is what i have learned on that experience. Do not bow down while brushing your teeth. :(

I hope to have a good afternoon later,,:)

Permalink Leave a Comment

December 6,2007

December 7, 2007 at 1:57 am (My journal) (, )

“To achieve success one must have constancy of purpose” .. these are the words written at the bottom of my Chemistry Exam questionnaire. The phrase which adds to the pressure and burden that i had to carry during the exam period. Yet, i do not understand what it tries to convey. I am not even sure if it had something to do with the questions or on the exam itself.

Nothing so good happened to me this day except for the neuron squeezing examination this afternoon. CHEMISTRY,!!! oh dear God!why did it exist? I know for myself that i wont fail that exam. :) Since I’ve answered all the questions , i just don’t know if all my answers are correct. :( (that is the sad thing there)

I have nothing more to say, i just hope tomorrow would be a great day :)

-hjl-

Permalink Leave a Comment

Voila!

December 6, 2007 at 6:56 am (Uncategorized)

I have my own blog now! :)

This seems to be great. Hello everyone! Thanks for visiting my home page. I would truly appreciate your comments and suggestions on my page. :)

I am still working on this, :)

God Bless!

Permalink Leave a Comment